Contracting Services - MSAs and SOWs

---

We engage clients under a Master Services Agreement (MSA) with Statements of Work (SOWs) for each defined project or workstream.  This structure is common in professional services because it creates a clear foundation for how we work together while keeping individual projects flexible, scoped, and easy to evolve.

The MSA is the “umbrella” agreement that defines the baseline terms of our relationship.  It establishes the consistent rules that should not need to be renegotiated every time a new project begins.

Typically, the MSA covers items such as:

• Confidentiality and data protection
• Intellectual property and ownership of deliverables, templates, and work product
• Security expectations (especially where systems, client data, or regulated environments are involved)
• Payment terms, invoicing cadence, and late-payment provisions
• Limitation of liability and indemnification (reasonable guardrails for both parties)
• Non-solicitation / conflict standards as applicable
• Dispute resolution and termination terms
• General legal terms like governing law and notices
   

Why it matters: The MSA provides stability and reduces friction. It protects both parties by setting clear expectations for how sensitive information, deliverables, and risk are handled without bogging down each new initiative in contract renegotiation.

A SOW is the project-specific document that sits under the MSA.  Each SOW defines the “what,” “how,” and “when” for a particular body of work.

Typically, an SOW includes:

• Project objectives and scope
• Deliverables and success criteria
• Timeline and milestones
• Roles and responsibilities (including what I need from the client to keep progress moving)
• Assumptions and dependencies
• Pricing model (fixed-fee, retainer, hourly, or hybrid) and what’s included
• Change control (how we handle new requirements or scope expansion)
   

Why it matters: The SOW makes the work concrete. It ensures we are aligned on outcomes, prevents scope confusion, and gives both parties a shared reference point for decisions, progress, and priorities.

Using an MSA + SOW model provides the best of both worlds:

• The MSA sets clear boundaries around confidentiality, IP, risk, and payment—so neither party is “winging it.”
• The SOW prevents misunderstandings by documenting scope, deliverables, and responsibilities up front.
   

In complex environments—especially where platforms, workflows, integrations, and operations are involved—needs evolve as systems are discovered, constraints surface, or priorities shift.  The SOW structure allows us to adapt without destabilizing the entire relationship.

• If a project expands, we use a Change Order or a new SOW.
• If priorities shift, we revise milestones and deliverables with clarity.
• If a new workstream emerges, it becomes its own SOW—cleanly scoped and agreed.

This keeps engagements professional and structured while still allowing them to develop organically as we learn, build, and refine.

Do I need an MSA before we start?
Yes.  The MSA establishes confidentiality and baseline terms so we can move quickly once scope is agreed.

What if the scope changes mid-project?
That’s normal. We address changes through a documented change process—either an SOW update, a Change Order, or a new SOW—so expectations stay aligned.

Why not just use one contract for everything?
Because one “all-in-one” document becomes hard to manage as work evolves.  The MSA keeps legal/relationship terms consistent, while each SOW keeps project scope clean and adaptable.

Most importantly, the way we structure our contracts and the way we track & manage projects are designed so our clients could potentially leverage R&D deductions (§174/§174A) and/or the R&D credit (§41 / Form 6765) when the work involves technical uncertainty + experimentation (not routine config). The IRS is increasingly focused on documenting costs by business component (feature/module/process).